Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations should admit more

refugees

Use synonyms

and supply them with help

such

Linking Words

as providing accommodation and food.

This

Linking Words

essay completely disagrees with that statement because it can lead to a depletion of resources and an increasing number of crimes in a country. More immigrants should not be received by governments because of the demolition of raw materials. If the government accepts more emigrants, it will increase the population drastically leading to high consumption.

Therefore

Linking Words

, the state can face a loss of natural wealth after several years.

For instance

Linking Words

, Turkey received many

refugees

Use synonyms

from Syria, but today water is the major issue in the state. Another reason why countries should not adopt more immigrants is the fact that it causes many problems within a nation

such

Linking Words

as an increasing number of crimes.

In other words

Linking Words

, migrants from different places have distinct traditions;

instead

Linking Words

, they behave as in their homeland leading to a conflict between Aboriginals.

For example

Linking Words

, many male foreigners from Syria follow Turkish women and want to flirt which contradicts Turkish people's culture and creates an argument between Turkish males and

refugees

Use synonyms

from Syria. In conclusion, acceptance of

refugees

Use synonyms

runs off the country's mineral resources and commits more crimes;

consequently

Linking Words

, I believe that states should not adopt newcomers from other countries.