The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Presently, in numerous cosmopolitan sites, urbanization causes a problem which is a plethora of people do not have a sufficient settlement. As a way to address

this

issue, there is a notion that assistance from the authorities is required. I agree with the proposed idea and in the following paragraphs, there will be explanations of my consideration.

To begin

with, massive cities like Jakarta and Singapore are able to master

this

issue by supporting a program

such

as constructing vertical apartments. From the previous illustration, obviously,

this

occasion cannot be done by other stakeholders

such

as society. Several activities

such

as releasing policies and providing appropriate areas are the government's responsibility.

As a result

, they have a massive portion in order to obliterate

this

social problem.

For instance

, the local administration in Jakarta constructed vertical construction to be used by an enormous population.

Furthermore

, providing habitable settlements to societies as a way to stop the negative implications

from

Change preposition

of

show examples

urbanization requires communal collaboration among stakeholders.

For example

, the government's assistance is needed to create mutual understanding among several elements

such

as local people and newcomers in order to minimize conflicts.

In addition

, long-term impacts will exist and some effects on ecology can be

concerned

Verb problem

considered

show examples

exceptionally by public policymakers.

Consequently

, housing problems might be solved if they are handled by the administrative element.

To conclude

, I agree that the shortage of settlement issues can be obliterated exceptionally by the governments in view the policymakers can create mutual understanding among people concerning the long-term implications of making appropriate houses.