It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Today, it is becoming more and more difficult to find animals included in the Red Book

such

as dodo, since there is no reason why nations should try to avoid it. I disagree with

this

view because I believe that we should try to keep as rare animals. On the one hand, I accept that it is important to help our environment and uncommon

pet

Fix the agreement mistake

pets

show examples

despite that in most communities there are the public who do not care about

such

things at all.

Firstly

, homeless creatures can be found,

for example

, even in the richest cities, and there are not a number of crowds who are worried about

this

problem. In my ,view society is worried about our nature and beast. When problems are on the horizon, and there are obvious ways to help, I can understand why a number of people believe that we should protect nature and limit beasts. At the same time, I believe that we helped uncommon beasts

founded

Replace the word

find

show examples

their home, In short individuals should find shelter for them and take care of them as much as possible if there is a rich person, it is uncommon to buy creatures and take care of them carefully.

Secondly

, the government should invest in natural welfare and catch hunters who harm many natures and the bodily world and collect money for animals. And of course, if the people and the government do not unite to save the bodily world, it will not do well. In conclusion, it is true that we cannot help

everyone

Correct your spelling

every

show examples

creature,

on the contrary

in my opinion we can

hand

Verb problem

help

show examples

the less fortunate.