The government should spend more money medical research to protect citizens’health than protecting the environment. Is this a positive or negative development?

There is a controversial perspective heating up a debate over whether it is essential for authorities to prioritise allocating money to medical studies for inhabitants’ health
instead
of preserving the surrounding. In my opinion, I would contend that it is optimal to combine both of these mentioned ideas. Without a shadow of a doubt, covering the cost of healthcare is of paramount significance on the ground that they are backbone industries for any nation in the world. Using the state’s money for the citizens to enjoy services from top-notch hospitals will create healthy personnel, which will make the economy of the nation thrive significantly.
For instance
, the German governor covers the medical cost for people in the form of social insurance to increase the quality of the labour workforce. It has made Germany become one of the most developed countries all around the world.
Therefore
, the healthcare field should be supported financially by government funds.
While
the importance of funding for the medical service of authorities is widely acknowledged, conserving the environment
also
needs to be paid for by the governors. Deterioration in environmental quality is an urgent problem that needs to be taken care of by the states. There are a wealth of contaminations, ranging from air, soil, and water to sound pollution, which does great damage to human physical health.
As a result
, alleviating environmental problems can enhance the well-being of humans.
For instance
, Croatia has devoted 1.5% of its GDP ,which is the highest expenditure for environmental problems in Europe, to deal with the surrounding troubles.
Hence
, it is pivotal for the governors to squander money on environmental conservation. In conclusion,
while
the importance of investing in the healthcare system is widely accepted, environmental protection should be considered a substantial part of the national budget.
Submitted by maryam.veiszadeh on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: