Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation.

With regard to competing to become the best in a certain field whether it can be associated with ordinary vocations, or artistic jobs, there will always be the ones who succeed in life earning huge sums of money, reputation and fame

while

the other stumbles and falls, painstakingly struggling along the line. In fact, many

people

think that

governments

should take responsibility to gain a balance of

this

inequitable problem. I, myself, only partly approve of

this

perspective and in

this

written essay, I will discuss whether the government should pay prompt attention to

this

. On the one hand, it is the responsibility of all

governments

to take care of citizens’ well-being, including

artists

’, in order to maintain

overall

development. For starters, poverty would decrease by huge numbers thanks to

this

policy. To be more precise,

people

wouldn’t need to worry about being poor and not being able to survive in their society.

People

would get on by partly relying on the government to make ends meet.

Secondly

, artworks represent culture, heritage, and history. Without artwork, those countries would be much less interesting and attractive, which leads to the underdevelopment of tourism.

As a result

, how

governments

treat the

artists

who create

such

works of art is remarkably meaningful. Another reason that accounts for the fact that the social status of

artists

varies across different regions would be the variety of indigenous tastes or typically perceptual demands of residents in each vicinity. Once again, it is the

governments

who are supposed to be in charge of alleviating the wide range of different artistic preferences. They can increase the frequency of public art displays to introduce independent

artists

to the mass public.

On the contrary

, there are logical reasons why many

people

believe an art-related grant is a waste of money or a riskily uncalculated investment. For one thing,

this

would certainly demotivate

people

from being successful and from even working. If

people

don’t work or as not as captivated as they did before, there wouldn’t be a livable society where

governments

spend all the money on the

people

.

This

could ruin society as they would not have taxes to collect, which means that they have no budgets to build infrastructures.

Besides

, since the worth of an artwork rests on

such

an emotional connection between the creators and the audiences, which is difficult to explain in detail with precise criteria, something of what is to come would be a nightmare with tons of unintentional consequences as the levels of expected profit fall short of faith. In fact, several

artists

have always been appreciated through their works of art, which are thought to have the complete package and can live better lives. Meanwhile, lots of

artists

whose works consist of dynamic elements as well still remain not officially recognized by most audiences. What if the

governments

swing the fences but just can’t hit the home run with these “unlucky”

artists

? To summarize, through the mentioned things above, one can see that there are no perfect things in the world, pros and cons are certainly everywhere. In my opinion,

this

is a topic which will be discussed endlessly.

In other words

, there is no absolute right or wrong answer when we conceptualize the role of the states in

this

area. Despite that, I have no extent of agreeing or disagreeing in general. What actually matters is that the

governments

and residents should gain joint responsibility for taking all of the currently existing conditions into account before taking the next steps.