There should only be one government in the world rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

There is an argument

that is

dealing with the statement of establishing one authority to control and regulate the

earth

rather than a national ministry for each nation. In my point of view, I believe that

this

phrase gives tremendous negative effects on each country. Each country has their own rights as an independent nation with different

systems

such

as support, laws, and policies. These structures are all based on the national background and history over time.

For example

, assuming that one national politic exists for all the world, it would be problematic and arguable to control

due to

the conflicts of understanding in relation to culture, history, and religion.

In addition

to

this

,

according to

the notion of the world, it is made of diverse types of continents gathered together as a united nature. In fact, the current society works

together with

other countries to develop and improve the better

earth

in various fields including environment, economy, policies, and culture.

Furthermore

, the education system affects the way of logical thinking and priorities, thereby the authority follows the political

systems

whether the democratic or the socialist

systems

.

For instance

, the democracy-based government emphasizes the freedom and the right of individuals,

whereas

the socialist system prioritizes the significance of an ethnic community and an individual's sacrifice for the public.

Therefore

, educational tendency definitely would be a crucial factor to consider the negative impact on all states on the

earth

. In conclusion, having explored the pitfalls of having one law on the

earth

, I found that individual country has their own rights to be developed based on their independent

systems

and the importance of the educational structures to develop the way of thinking and priorities.