Rich countries often give money to poorer countries. But it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In four corners of the globe,

poverty

exists and rich

countries

try to solve

poverty

by giving

money

to poor

countries

but most of the time,

this

problem is not solved with

this

idea so powerful

countries

, should think about other solutions. I totally agree with the opinion

due to

the reasons which will be discussed in the following paragraphs. Without a shadow of a doubt ,financial help is useful and it contributes to solving a slight fragment of

poverty

in the world but it is not abundant. Not only is

money

spent easily by authorities but

also

they never understand how to make

money

. By way of example, I knew a man who always lamented about his life level and his father had helped him before he went to work and

this

story had been occurring for several years

while

he never learned how to save

money

and just when he went for a real job his life changed completely. The other reason for my opinion is related to a famous phrase; no pain , no gain. Developed

countries

should learn to diminish

countries

and how to mend their economies and establish new jobs for

money

production. Not once was giving loans help to solve poorer

countries

' problems because after some time

money

will be finished. Despite

this

lucrative businesses always help to economy.

For example

, selling goods

such

as dresses, books, cars and many other things to other

countries

is a sustainable way to earn

money

.

To sum up

, as discussed in the following paragraphs I totally agree with the idea that developed lands should find another way to help

poverty

besides

giving

money

to diminished

countries

.