Some people think secondary school students should learn international news as one of their subjects, while others believe that this is a waste of valuable time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is an issue of hot debate whether pupils of secondary school ought to learn about global updates as one of their curricula or is spoiling their precious time. As far as I am concerned I am in the favour of former notion. In

this

Linking Words

essay, I will discuss both sides and I will try to give an opinion from my best experience. To commence with the initial view that the proponents believe that studying global updates by secondary school children can provide them with a perfect shape for all-around growth in their future. To elaborate on

this

Linking Words

, students can become more informed citizens and obtain critical thinking those things can bring the country in a great direction.

For Instance

Linking Words

, in India, the majority of schools deliver global learning to their school pupils, and in future,

this

Linking Words

helps them to settle abroad perfectly.

Moreover

Linking Words

, with the help of global knowledge children can easily learn about global cultures

as well as

Linking Words

global affairs.

However

Linking Words

, opponents claim that educating the global news or knowledge to secondary students brings several disadvantages to their academics.

In other words

Linking Words

, worldwide learning is not as important as academic education because their curriculum is already packed with tough subjects

such

Linking Words

as mathematics or science subject. Students should only follow these subjects

instead

Linking Words

of spoiling their time on waste matters. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

both sides have their own pros

as well as

Linking Words

cons I believe that schools should provide academic education importantly but along academics, they ought to offer global knowledge from across the world that can confine great shape to their career.