Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view

Individuals are split when it comes to captive

animals

. Some believe that keeping these creatures in cages, like what are nowadays in zoos, is a continuous mistake. Others,

on the contrary

, assert that there are some beneficial aspects of

this

phenomenon for both humans and

animals

. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss and conclude by clearly stating my viewpoint. On the one hand, opponents of keeping

animals

in captivity claim that it has a detrimental effect on them in the long run. Primarily, compared to their natural habitats they are being kept in small cages which are artificial environments.

Moreover

, these creatures are being used for villain purposes like testing medicine which is very painful. From another angle, proponents,

conversely

respond that providing these safe environments for

animals

has its own advantages.

Initially

,

this

situation provides opportunities to contact wild inhabitants

as well as

learning children to respect them

for instance

a bear.

In addition

, endangered species could have breeding programs to fight against extinction

for instance

iranian tiger. From my perspective, I personally believe that zoos are safe and the best place for endangered

animals

to keep them away from hunters until they are not a place for amusement at the expense of the extinction of a rare specie. In conclusion, it is obvious that

this

controversial subject especially with the increase in the number of animal lovers

as well as

vegans or vegetarians is an endless battle. I tend to agree with the proponents since they have a more robust argument. It should not be forgotten that captivity has its own adverse effects as well.