Many cities replace farmlands and parks with houses. Is it positive or negative

A majority of people are indeed living in the urban centres so some parks and farmlands are replaced by commercial housing. To encourage active lifestyles and reasonable resource allocation, in my opinion, those areas should not be occupied by houses, in an effort to gain more benefit for dwellers who live around there. It is true that the increasing housing price has become a major obstacle for many cities to attract investment and talent, which is blamed by tens of millions of inhabitants who suffer from the shortage of housing supply.
Therefore
, there is no doubt that municipal authorities should add more places for dwellers so that cities can accommodate more populations and enterprises,
thus
meeting growing needs and fueling the local economy.
However
, we should ensure enough food for the world’s population to live on. Some experts predict that by the year 2050, the human population will increase by about three billion people by
then
. Nowadays, many lands that are suitable for raising crops are in use.
As a result
of it, we should keep farmlands to ensure productivity. As long as we guarantee the production of grain, the cost of food will not rise too fast which will affect the quality of life directly.
Although
our farming technology develops rapidly, we should not expropriate agricultural land.
Furthermore
, green land is
also
an ideal place for exercise, particularly for those who are not interested in indoor sports. Jogging and dancing over there are quite common among elderly citizens these days. In a park with a high greening rate, plants and trees can absorb waste gases and provide green shade, creating a comfortable environment for city dwellers. Those who spend leisure time in the green land can have close contact with nature and make themselves refreshed.
Therefore
, is not only for greening and beauty but
also
represents the humanistic care of a city.
To conclude
, in the process of urban planning and construction, building parks and keeping farmland should be emphasized.
Submitted by 76805977 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: