The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts demonstrate the comparison of money that was spent on different sectors by the regional authority in 2010 and 2015.
Overall
, for the several years number have not changed, Linking Words
thus
, education , healthcare and pension retained their leading positions Linking Words
while
culture ,transport and interest of borrowing remained the most unfunded areas.
Linking Words
According to
the data, the main fields did not show a rapid rise or drop and changes constituted less than 5 per cent for each of them. Education became less financed, losses were exactly 3 per cent by the end of the period. The same tendency experienced a defence, funding of Linking Words
this
branch decreased in 2015 by 3% as well.
Industries that were less influence in 2010 ,Linking Words
on the contrary
, rose and got more support from the government. Linking Words
Thus
, the welfare economy went up and by the end of the estimation period reached 13% in comparison with 8% that were in 2010. Linking Words
Moreover
, the borrowing section doubled its sponsorship in 2015, Linking Words
their
figures grew up from 5% to 10% for 5 years.Correct pronoun usage
its
Submitted by tsaryk2004 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "thus".
▼
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "changed" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "comparison" was used 2 times.
▼