Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.

Sports

sectors who are accomplished in their field should be paid higher than different practitioners

such

as doctors and engineers. Whilst the proponents consider that they should deserve a high salary, opponents agree that

this

leads to inequality. In the following essay, both notions will be scrutinized, and I will show my support for the first one. On the one hand,

sports

competitions are highly competitive and difficult to get prizes, so professionals have to make good efforts. No pain no gain which means those achievements are a basement of hard-working.

For instance

, William Ken who is the winner of the World Competition of Tennis once said he spent every hour in his practice and get injured more than five times.

This

is one example of them having to deserve a high amount of income because most of the other workers working for 40 hours a week.

On the other hand

, opponents say that other crucial

fields

such

as medics should be get placed first

instead

of sportsmen.

For example

, some statistics revealed that World's highly salaried work

fields

are not changing through the

last

centuries because those

fields

do not replace. From

this

point of view,

sports

practitioners never get the highest income compared to other

fields

.

To conclude

, all special workers give effort in their job field but it is true that

sports

sectors spent their whole life on their achievement.

Hence

, governments have to make some good policies so that they will be assessed fairly.