The advancement of internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Although
Linking Words
some people believe that
due to
Linking Words
the advancement of information technology, it is not obvious to visit other states to acquire knowledge about the ways people live, some public has a contrasting view. I have a mixed opinion because I think some aspects of knowledge about lifestyles can be earned by watching from far away but some of them definitely depend on real-life engagements. On the one hand, since travelling the other countries is time-consuming and at the same time cost-effective, it is beneficial to see the ways of life through the Internet. As the web is available and cheap, anybody can access it.
For example
Linking Words
, to know how the nomad Australians build their habitats, it is expensive to roam there
while
Linking Words
so many videos are available on YouTube.
Additionally
Linking Words
, humankind is so busy managing time visits, so cyberspace could be a powerful alternative.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the understandings from the screens must not be permanent in spite of investing a lot of time.
For instance
Linking Words
, it is impractical to learn how people prepare street foods in Dhaka (the capital of Bangladesh) and how the tastes vary.
Moreover
Linking Words
,
as a result
Linking Words
of an increasing number of travellers around the world, airfare and accommodation costs decreased significantly and that's why the expenditures do not matter anymore. Some features of the lives get more preference than others. So I reckon behaviours like surviving in harsh climates or practices for good health can be gathered through visiting the host nations
while
Linking Words
less important aspects like food habits or social customs may be achieved through passive media.
To sum up
Linking Words
, neither side of the claim is entirely correct for having advantages and limitations. It is human responsibility to categorise the fields to have active education or indirect mastery.
Submitted by mostafiz.rahman.cse on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: