Some people believe that zoos where animals are kept in man-made environment should no longer exist in the 21st century. Do you agree or disagree?

Some individuals think that

zoos

, which house

animals

in artificial environments, should not be around in contemporary society. From my perspective, the presence of limited spaces

such

as

zoos

must be excluded in terms of moralities. The ethical concerns about confining

animals

in

zoos

can not be overlooked. First and foremost, it limits their freedom despite the fact that

animals

are strongly obsessed with being free.

Animals

are often suited to small enclosures, depriving them of their natural habitat and posing them under human control, which leads to the loss of their instincts.

As a result

,

this

captivity leads to stress, depression and a shortened lifespan for these creatures.

For

this

reason, society should respect human rights, allowing them to live in their natural environments rather than confining them to unsuitable surroundings. At present days,

zoos

have become increasingly unattractive to the public

due to

the extinction of biodiversity. Since the general number of fauna is decreasing, constraining creatures in

zoos

is considered to be unsensible. If the

animals

do not breed in natural conditions, their number will not sufficiently multiply and directly lead to vanishing.Take a Pallas’s cat as an example, it is included in 100 rare

animals

of the world. Interestingly, in one of the

zoos

in ,Russia two of these species died for unknown reasons which caused a global shock.

Thus

, it is more practical to promote

animals

’ rights and organise movements

instead

of keeping them in man-made

zoos

. In conclusion, some people argue that

zoos

are suitable in

this

era because it is the main way to protect

animals

, in spite of that I am convinced that

zoos

only outbalance the ecosystem.