The increase in tourism has led to the destruction of the environment, thus tourism ought to be banned in certain areas? What is your opinion

Tourism

has been a huge contributor for many economies around the world. Despite its importance, it has

also

led to a surge in environmental

pollution

.

Thus

, governments have imposed strict regulations to safeguard the environment in certain

areas

by banning

access

. In my opinion, I partially agree with

this

decision. To commence with exploring history and culture, it has been a phenomenon for many tourists to visit various places around the world, but there are instances which have been reported about the land

pollution

created by the tourists when visiting these

areas

.

Therefore

, it is the responsibility of the state to preserve these

areas

for the future generation. For an example: - In Sri Lanka, visiting the wild in the south of the country had been a famous activity among the tourist, but

due to

the increased

pollution

, the

government

has taken a decision to prevent

access

to these

areas

because of safety of endangered species living in the forest.

On the other hand

,

tourism

is a critical factor for an economy of a country. Imposing barriers in certain

areas

would lead to a reduction in the disposable income level of people who are dependent with

tourism

.

This

would lead to a rise in the poverty level, and will

also

limit foreign currency flowing into the country.

Hence

, the

government

should think of an alternative way to achieve the same task expected from banning

access

to these

areas

. For an instance: - In Sri Lanka, there was a rise in nautical

tourism

.

Due to

the

pollution

created by dumping plastic products in the ocean, the

government

banned diving in coral reefs.

However

, after a certain time they allowed

access

for diving with strict monitoring regulations in place. In conclusion, I am of the view that it should be the natural instinct of everyone to safeguard the environment, so that all the activities are carried out would be environmentally friendly. On the flip side, the

government

should have a better monitoring system rather than preventing

access

to certain

areas

and causing a damage for

tourism

.