Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nowadays, many
people
think that government should build more
railways
than roads. In my opinion, I agree with
this
point of view because
railways
have many benefits than roads in many faces.
Railways
bring us many benefits
such
as safety and cheap
prize
Correct your spelling
prices
show examples
for
people
to use.
Firstly
, moving on
railways
is much safer than roads because it has many safety measures
such
as maintaining and modernizing infrastructure and equipment.
For
example
, we have to strictly follow safety measures when building railroads to make sure that there are no issues when functioning.
Secondly
,
trains
Fix the agreement mistake
train
show examples
and
railways
Fix the agreement mistake
railway
show examples
vehicle tickets are very cheap for many
people
due to
the high capacity and number of users per day.
For
example
, Ha Noi’s metro usually takes 600 for each kilometre and taxis' prizes are usually around 10.000 for each kilometre. Some environmental problems
also
being
solve
Wrong verb form
solved
show examples
if we build more
railways
.
Firstly
, many modern subways and metros are using electricity for power supply, we are all sure that electricity is safer and more eco-friendly than fossil fuel.
For
example
, if we change all traditional
trains
to electric
trains
, it will decrease 46% of greenhouse gas in the future.
Secondly
, more
people
using the train means that there are fewer traffic jams and
also
decrease accidents from vehicles.
For
example
, if
people
use more
trains
than their vehicles,
this
will decrease traffic accident rates and air pollution which is
also
one of the causes of lung cancer. In conclusion,
railways
are safer and cheaper, and the environment will be better if we use
trains
instead
of road transport. I think that government should build more
railways
so that we can be able to solve many problems.
Submitted by amusetour14 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Task Response: The essay provides a clear opinion on the topic, but the arguments lack depth and development. Ensure to support the main points with detailed explanations and evidence.
coherence cohesion
Coherence & Cohesion: The essay shows some organization but lacks a strong introduction and conclusion. Make sure to have a well-developed introduction that states the purpose of the essay, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points and restates the opinion.
lexical resource
Lexical Resource: The essay demonstrates adequate use of vocabulary and some sentence variety. Try to improve the range and accuracy of vocabulary use to enhance the essay's clarity and sophistication.
grammatical range
Grammatical Range: There are varied sentence structures used, but some errors in grammar and punctuation are present. Aim for greater accuracy in sentence structures and eliminate errors related to subject-verb agreement and punctuation.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: