some people think healthcare should be free for everyone others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves discuss both view and give your opinion.

The question of whether

healthcare

services

should be free of charge or whether individuals should afford their medical expenses remained a contentious issue.

This

essay will explore both viewpoints and highlight the pros and cons of each. On the one hand, the opponents of the free

healthcare

system raise a concern about its potential implications. Implementing free-of-charge medical

services

can provide some negative consequences for the government and

following

this

for society.

That is

to say, the government should increase taxes to afford hospital expenses, and

this

issue has detrimental implications for those who are financially disadvantaged.

In addition

, the critics hold the view that the government might face a budget deficit in the long run, and they cannot provide funds for other vital sectors,

such

as education systems. On the flip side, the advocates of free-of-charge

healthcare

services

argue that it is a fundamental human right and on top of that, is the first step toward society's equality. Regardless of the financial status of people, they should be covered by equal medical

services

.

This

attitude can

also

promote community well-being and provide a sense of peace of mind in society.

Thus

, I firmly believe that everyone should be covered by cost-free medical

services

, and

this

can promote social cohesion.

Furthermore

, free

healthcare

systems can contribute to preventive care and early interventions, leading to reduce

healthcare

burdens in the long run.

To conclude

,

although

free

healthcare

services

have their own demerits, their drawbacks are undoubtedly overshadowed by gigantic bright sides.

Hence

, governors should put

this

vital right of residents as a top concern.