Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is argued by some individuals that

parents

ought to cultivate

children

how to behave in the social context. Meanwhile, others think that

teachers

are the people who do

this

.

This

essay will discuss both arguments and I believe that both parties are the important

figures

to do so. The fundamental reason why

parents

should teach

children

how to be good members of society is that they are the closest

figures

for

children

.

This

means that

parents

are the people who are trusted by

children

and they have the authority to do

this

. When

parents

cultivate the

value

of

children

, the opportunity for

children

to obey is greater.

Moreover

, as closets

figures

for

children

,

parents

can provide an example directly of how to be good in the community.

For example

,

parents

can provide real examples to respect for the elderly and respect for others by showing the action

while

children

are present.

Thus

,

parents

have a significant role to provide good

value

for

children

so that they can behave appropriately in society.

In addition

, the school has the authority to do so with certain subjects.

Teachers

are the people who are looked up to by

children

. They will pay attention to what

teachers

say because they believe that it is surely good.

Moreover

,

teachers

also

can bring the

value

of life to the subject like ethics.

For instance

, from elementary school to high school, Indonesian students will learn about ethics and character through the subject called Budi Pekerti and Kewarganegaraan.

Thus

, schools have formal ways to instil the

value

how to be good in the community.

To sum up

, it is debatable who are the best

figures

to teach juveniles to behave in the community. I believe that both

parents

and

teachers

are the

figures

to do so.