Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

In the present day, since

tourism

is a vital source of revenue for many countries, a lot of governments encourage

tourism

to boost attraction.

However

, the fact that as tourists visit those places, local culture can be destroyed, supports the opinion that

tourism

should be prohibited. Some people believe that

tourism

is necessary, and even if it were banned, there would be no merit.

This

essay will discuss both viewpoints, and I personally support the latter opinion.

To begin

, it is certainly true that sometimes

tourism

has a negative impact on local

residents

due to

noise pollution. Travellers tend to chat or scream because they are excited by spectacular buildings or scenery, so

residents

cannot live in peace and quiet.

Furthermore

, since tourists throw away litter

such

as plastic bottles or food containers on the road, it is quite possible that it is a burden on

residents

to keep cleaning. Having said that, countries cannot help but promote

tourism

as one of the crucial sources of revenue because it is true that benefits from

tourism

account for a large part of their finances.

Tourism

can be a significant source of income for local communities, providing jobs and supporting businesses.

Therefore

, a ban on

tourism

could lead to economic hardship for many individuals who rely on the industry. In conclusion,

although

tourists have negative effects, including noise pollution

due to

overcrowding, it is an inevitable industry for

residents

. I would say if

residents

feel uncomfortable because of too many visitors, there is a solution: they can impose taxes or admission fees on them.