Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. Tp what extent do you agree with this view?

Other individuals argue that the state is wasting its budget on the

arts

and must focus on other things. In my opinion, I believe that the

government

is not spending unproductively on the

arts

. I do not agree that the state is spending unproductively on the

arts

because in reality its fund is focused on globalisation, healthcare and education. The

government

has a minimum budget for the

arts

. To exemplify, writers in the country are not fully supported as most of them are working privately or in a freelance business. It means that the financial aid coming from the

government

may only be in sponsorships or marketing the writers internationally. It is the same as well with singers and dancers who are in the performing

arts

. There are only a few of them who are successful, and their success is not rooted in the money shared by the

government

. As a case in point, the funds allocated to the

arts

are almost not relevant for people to argue that it is wasted, as artists are maximising the country's minimal monetary contribution to their success and achievement of recognition internationally. In my opinion, the

government

must invest more in the

arts

.

In

Change preposition

From

show examples

a broader perspective,

arts

also

encompasses architecture and engineering. To illustrate, an infrastructure cannot be fully developed without the basic elements of the

arts

such

as shapes, angles, lines, and colours. It means that having better infrastructure with functional facilities will provide better access to healthcare and education, which can be a part of the country competing globally. In conclusion, the

government

is not wasting money on the

arts

. As a matter of fact, the

government

must expand its investment in the

arts

to deliver better services to meet the needs of its people in terms of health and education.