More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime. Do the benefits of these measures outweigh the drawbacks?

These days, metropolitan areas have extensively implemented approaches to reduce the elevated crime rate which affects the

safety

of residents. In my point of view, I believe the detrimental impacts of

this

strategy are more significant than the advantages it brings. The first negative effect of

this

strategy is that it may weaken the economy. To be specific,

safety

procedures necessitate the additional allocation of equipment

as well as

an involved labour force.

This

leads to a growth in government expenditure which is generated by taxes on citizens.

For instance

, increasing the number of police on the streets requires a great budget for officers' salaries, operational vehicles and weapons. Another adverse consequence is that it may provide inconvenience for residents. If

safety

measures become more complicated, citizens must regularly comply with a wide range of regulations.

For example

, when entering a building, employees must form a queue to go through a scanning machine to ensure there are no illegal items brought into the building.

As a result

, there will be extra time to accomplish daily tasks for individuals. In conclusion, many large areas have increased the imposed method to raise the

safety

of residents.

However

, I believe that the drawbacks, including the heavier financial burden for the government and inconvenience for citizens, prevail over the benefits

such

as reduced crime.