The responsibility of preventing and reducing global environmental damage lies in the hands of politicians and individuals have little impact. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems have risen alarmingly worldwide. Many believe that people individually have less power to solve
this
phenomenon. I disagree with those who argue that this
responsibility belongs only to politicians
because a comprehensive collaboration is urgently needed.
Global environmental damage is a huge problem. It is indeed that politicians
have a major voice to influence people and government. They could address a new regulation to prevent and reduce this
damage. Nevertheless
, the number of politicians
is too small and probably accounts for one-third of the population. Without real movement
and changes, the regulation would only be a piece of written argument. For example
, the Safe the Earth campaign declare
by the Wrong verb form
declared
politicians
on television would be useless if there is little to no support from individuals
. Therefore
, a collaborative action is necessary and needs to be considered.
On the other hand
, a small impact by each individual on earth can bring profound change. The accumulation of real continuous movement
will result in a greater positive impact. In order to solve a global problem, recent studies show that the involvement of all stakeholder are critical. All layers ranging from individuals
to politicians
, international bodies, and government are responsible for taking action together. An effort to reduce household products, recycling plastic bottles, reusing bags, and wise use of electricity are examples of individual responsibility for tackling environmental problems. Moreover
, the community awareness of environmental-friendly action in developed countries like Europe is also
great evidence of how individuals
could successfully be part of the Safe Earth movement
.
In conclusion, preventing and reducing environmental damage is the responsibility of all human beings. Even though politician has strong power, this
problem is considerably unable to be solved only by them. Therefore
, an inclusive movement
involving individuals
should be addressed.Submitted by ambercampbell.xx25 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
introduction conclusion present
You have provided a clear introduction and conclusion which addresses the topic. However, some main points could be more explicitly supported with specific examples or evidence to strengthen the argument.
logical structure
Your essay demonstrates a logical structure with clear progression of ideas. There are however some areas where transitions could be smoother, and paragraphing could be employed more effectively to delineate your main points.
complete response
While you have responded directly to the task, there could be a more developed expansion of the ideas presented. Clearer and more comprehensive explanations, alongside a range of relevant examples or case studies, would significantly improve your response.
supported main points
Your main points are relevant to the topic; nonetheless, they could be bolstered through the incorporation of more detailed examples and a stronger analytical perspective.
clear comprehensive ideas
Your ideas are clear, though they could benefit from being expanded upon for a deeper and more comprehensive exploration of the topic at hand.
relevant specific examples
The examples you provided are relevant but they need to be more specific, detailed, and directly linked to the main point of each paragraph both to clarify and to reinforce your argument.