Some people think that government can save the envirinment while other people think that people needs to take responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A minimal amount of

people

consider that

government

could rescue the natural resources.

While

some

people

believe that the

environment

was being guarded by folks. In my opinion, I agree that mother nature should be taken care of by human beings. On the one hand, there are several reasons that the

environment

was protected by the administration.

To begin

, setting off rules as a strategy was applied in their country to take care of natural resources easily.

Besides

that, if the

residents

violate laws, they are accountable for their actions as tried in the country's law.

This

can lead

people

to obey the rules of the authority.

For example

, the ministry was noticed to put litter in bins, if the citizen throws garbage away, they will be fined by the

government

.

Thus

,

people

must be amenable to the law, if they do not penalty so that the

environment

will improve.

On the other hand

, there are drawbacks regarding setting up and proposing new laws to protect the

environment

, if the

residents

do not

have

Add the particle

tohave

show examples

acknowledge to protect the climate.

Firstly

, the

government

must transmit messages to

residents

about protecting the

environment

is vital. So the

residents

consider their actions whether impact natural resources or not.

For example

, the

government

was informed that the environmental situation is crucial,

we

Correct word choice

and we

show examples

need to take care of the

environment

,

,

Change the punctuation

apply

show examples

otherwise

Add a comma

,otherwise

show examples

new generations of us will be affected.

Hence

,

people

take responsibility for their actions. In my conclusion, habitat protection is a long story that we haven't solved yet. From my perspective, the protected

environment

needs to be saved by

residents

.