The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It’s true that the subject of what is the purpose of

science

has been a controversial issue that people like to debate about. Some

scientists

argue that the aim should be the improvement of people’s lives,

however

, others assert that it should not be only for humans.

This

essay will explain two views, and state why disagree with

this

idea.

To begin

with, numerous

scientists

argue that the most important purpose of

science

is developing

further

technologies for human beings. There are two main reasons.

Firstly

,

science

and technology have flourished and thrived in human culture enormously.

For example

, the industrial revolution incurred in the early 19 century allowed to increase in productivity.

Secondly

, it has enabled people to reduce the distress and hardship in their lives through great inventions and discoveries

such

as vehicles and energy resources.

On the other hand

, other

scientists

assert that the aim of scientific technology is to comprehend the principles existing in the world and space.

For instance

, many

scientists

have been making their efforts to understand the universe.

Moreover

, they state that it is not only for humans but

also

for all creatures on Earth and even in space. Especially, they have made some efforts to breed extinct animals using genetic technologies.

This

shows that it is not undeniable that

science

is not limited to human beings. In conclusion, I disagree with the idea that the most important aim of

science

must be to improve humans because

science

is helping not only human beings but

also

the other creatures on Earth, and it

additionally

let

Correct subject-verb agreement

lets

show examples

people comprehend the principle of the universe.