IELTS Writing Correction Service /
Writing Samples /
Band 6

Some people think that the money used to preserve historic buildings and artefacts should came from goverment funds, while others believe that private organisations and individuals should pay for this. Discuss both views and give your opinion

#people #money #buildings #artefacts #goverment #funds #organisations #individuals
The financing of the
preservation
 of historic structures and artefacts is a topic that elicits varying opinions, with proponents advocating for
government
 funding and others supporting contributions from private entities. On the one hand, those in favour of
government
 funding argue that historical
preservation
 is a societal responsibility that necessitates public resources. They assert that historic buildings and artefacts are cultural treasures that belong to the nation as a whole. As
such
,
government
 funds can ensure equitable access to
preservation
 efforts, safeguarding these treasures for the benefit of all citizens.
Additionally
, state involvement can prevent the influence of profit motives, ensuring that
preservation
 decisions are based on cultural significance rather than financial gain.
On the other hand
, proponents of private organizations and individual contributions contend that involving non-governmental entities can expedite the
preservation
 process. Private organizations and individuals often possess the financial means and expertise to effectively restore and maintain historic sites.
This
 approach can
also
 instil a sense of ownership among citizens, fostering a collective commitment to preserving cultural heritage.
Furthermore
, relying on private funding can reduce the strain on
government
 resources and promote innovative approaches to conservation. In my opinion, a balanced approach that combines both
government
 funding and private contributions is optimal.
While
government
 funds ensure the inclusivity of
preservation
 efforts, private entities bring innovation and efficiency to the process. A collaborative approach would not only maximize financial resources but
also
 reinforce the shared responsibility of safeguarding cultural heritage. Ultimately, preserving historic buildings and artefacts is a shared duty that necessitates a combined effort from both the public and private sectors.
Submitted by namkhanh.tran2310 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: