The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

#aim #science #people #lives

The question of whether scientific endeavours should primarily serve to improve people's well-being or advance groundbreaking discoveries, potentially regardless of harm, is a subject of ongoing debate. I firmly advocate that scientific breakthroughs should primarily contribute to the sustainable progress of humanity.

To begin

with, those engaged in scholarly pursuits are integral members of society.

Consequently

, the pursuit of innovations that could undermine prospects for a brighter future not only impacts society adversely but

also

poses risks to the very individuals involved in these pursuits. An illustrative case is the development of the atomic bomb at Los Alamos during World War 2. During

this

process, numerous experts and students were exposed to the detrimental effects of uranium. Despite the eventual use of the bomb contributing to the conclusion of the war, the suffering endured by over 100,000 innocent citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki mirrored the afflictions faced by those involved in the experiments.

Thus

, before embarking on any new invention or discovery, comprehensive contemplation of potential repercussions and their implications on individual lives is imperative.

Additionally

, governments consistently channel substantial financial resources into scientific undertakings.

For instance

, the construction of a nuclear bomb in the 1940s consumed roughly 2 billion dollars. A substantial portion of these funds was derived from taxes paid by hardworking citizens, many of whom were grappling with financial constraints. It is my conviction that expending hard-earned money on endeavours that significantly exacerbate the burdens faced by individuals is ethically unacceptable. In conclusion, scientific progress must unequivocally contribute to the well-being of society at large. I strongly recommend that ethical considerations be ingrained within the fabric of all research pursuits.

Submitted by ryskulovstreet on Sun Aug 20 2023

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

7Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

273 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 9.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.0

Complete response

6.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 checks
Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
Unlimited Task 2 checks
Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
Personalized suggestions
Know how to boost your score.
Detailed mistakes analysis
Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
Topic ideas generator
Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
Vocabulary helper
Get the right words for any topic.
Progress tracking
Track your writing improvements.

Topic Vocabulary:

crucial role
technological advancements
medical discoveries
life-changing inventions
innovations
solutions to human problems
enhancing quality of life
improvement of healthcare
transportation
communication
agriculture
energy sectors
eradication of diseases
prolongation of life expectancy
global challenges
climate change
overpopulation
food security
developed world
underprivileged communities

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

7
band
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to the cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing,  Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Many countries around the world are experiencing an increase in urban population. As a consequence, the rural populations are declining at a significant rate. This sparks a debate about whether this is a positive or a negative development. This essay argues that this phenomenon is a positive development for a number of reasons that will be discussed in upcoming paragraphs.
6.5
band
Some people believe we should protect all wild animals. Others believe it is only important to protect some. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The conservation of wild animals is a subject of considerable debate. On one hand, some argue that all wild animals should be protected, irrespective of their ecological significance or status. On the other hand, there are those who believe that conservation efforts should be focused on select species, particularly those that are endangered or play a critical role in their ecosystems. This essay will explore both viewpoints and provide a personal perspective on the matter.
4
band
Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. Write an essay expressing your point of view. Give reasons for your answers and provide relevant example and experience you might have.
Parents are children's first teachers, they are the first people who impact knowledge in a child. While some people believe either men or women have a greater role in raising kids, I would argue that both parents are better off raising the children together. Due to the various impacts they both have on the children.
<4
band
It is better to learn the way people lived in past through films and videos records than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
i guess it is better to learn the way people lived in past through films and videos records than written documents. it will be more exiting and clear for the viewers to learn. in my opinion i see that filming people who lived in the past more that documents in way much things to inform the people the right way, on the other side some people see the documents and written books better than videos, they see it big proof because the old people wrote it, but in my opinion i see the videos is much better and clearly than documents and easy to share it and explain it
5
band
Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that It should be change the old building to the modern building to save the money spend for protecting and repairing. From my point of view, I agree with this idea for many reasons,described in the following paragraph.

The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Fully explain your ideas

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to the cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing, Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Some people believe we should protect all wild animals. Others believe it is only important to protect some. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is better to learn the way people lived in past through films and videos records than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to the cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing,  Do you think this is a positive or negative development?