Breakfast at Tiffany's and bottles of bubbles. Girls with tattoos who like getting in trouble. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued whether scientists should strive to improve and strengthen people's welfare or make breakthroughs in the realm of science no matter how harmful they would be to all of us. I fully agree that scientific discoveries should only pave the way for
further
sustainable development of humanity.
Firstly
, scholars themselves are a significant part of society.
Thus
, by intending to create something that would devastate many people's hopes for a bright future, they only harm themselves.
For instance
,
while
constructing an atomic bomb in Los-Alamos during World War 2, numerous science experts and students were exposed to the truly detrimental effects of uranium. Though the usage of
this
bomb
finally
led to the end of World War 2, more than 100, 000 peaceful citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended up having the same symptoms as the experts had during experiments.
Therefore
, before inventing something or making a discovery scientists should thoroughly contemplate the potential repercussions and how would they reflect on one's life.
Secondly
, the government always makes it a point to allocate financial help to the scientific field. A case in point is the 2 billion dollars that were spent by the US government in order to build a nuclear bomb in the 1940s. Most of these expenditures were taken from taxes that many citizens were obliged to pay, even though they might have been making ends meet. In my opinion, it is morally unacceptable to waste the money, which people were trying to earn through blood, sweat and tears, on something that would immensely aggravate their sufferings. Taking everything into account, inventions should only foster everyone's well-being. I highly recommend scientists instil into their minds the notion of seeing moral questions as the prerequisite of any research.
Submitted by ryskulovstreet on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Response
Task Response: Address both sides of the argument to fully engage with the task. Consider presenting counterarguments and providing a balanced view.
Coherence and Cohesion
Coherence and Cohesion: Use more cohesive devices to link ideas between sentences and paragraphs for better flow and coherence.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: