The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is debated whether scientists should strive to enhance and bolster people's well-being or pursue groundbreaking advancements in the realm of science, regardless of potential harm. I firmly agree that scientific discoveries should primarily pave the way for the sustainable development of humanity.
Firstly
Linking Words
, scholars themselves are an integral part of society.
Thus
Linking Words
, intending to create something that could devastate many people's hopes for a bright future harms not only society but
also
Linking Words
the scientists themselves.
For example
Linking Words
, during the construction of the atomic bomb in Los Alamos during World War 2, numerous science experts and students were exposed to the detrimental effects of uranium.
Although
Linking Words
the usage of
this
Linking Words
bomb eventually led to the end of World War 2, more than 100,000 peaceful citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki suffered the same symptoms as the experts did during experiments.
Therefore
Linking Words
, prior to inventing something or making a discovery, science experts should thoroughly contemplate the potential repercussions and their impact on individuals' lives.
Secondly
Linking Words
, governments consistently allocate substantial financial resources to scientific advancements.
For instance
Linking Words
, during the 1940s, around 2 billion dollars were spent on building a nuclear bomb in the USA. A significant portion of these funds were obtained from taxes paid by hardworking citizens, many of whom were struggling to make ends meet. In my view, it is morally unacceptable to squander money that people
earned
Wrong verb form
earn
show examples
through blood, sweat and tears on something that would significantly exacerbate their suffering. Taking everything into consideration, scientific inventions should unequivocally foster the well-being of all. I strongly recommend that scientists prioritize moral considerations as an essential foundation for any research endeavour.
Submitted by ryskulovstreet on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that all paragraphs directly relate to the task and each other. The structure should include an introduction, body paragraphs with clear topic sentences, and a conclusion.
task achievement
The essay is well-aligned with the task prompt, providing a clear argument and relevant supporting examples. Ensure that the response maintains a consistent focus on the task and avoids tangential discussions.
lexical resource
Expand the range of vocabulary used to express ideas. Incorporate a variety of synonyms and more complex language structures to enhance the lexical resource.
grammatical range
While the essay demonstrates a good command of grammar, aim to incorporate more complex sentence structures, including a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • crucial role
  • technological advancements
  • medical discoveries
  • life-changing inventions
  • innovations
  • solutions to human problems
  • enhancing quality of life
  • improvement of healthcare
  • transportation
  • communication
  • agriculture
  • energy sectors
  • eradication of diseases
  • prolongation of life expectancy
  • global challenges
  • climate change
  • overpopulation
  • food security
  • developed world
  • underprivileged communities
What to do next:
Look at other essays: