Globalisation has highlighted the need for international communication. It is often argued that English should be compulsory subject for all school children around the world. Others argue that this would do more harm than good. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent times, globalization has emphasized the importance of international

communication

. Some people argue that

English

should be a mandatory

subject

for all school children worldwide,

while

others believe that

this

approach

would have more negative consequences than positive ones. In

this

essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and provide my opinion. On the one hand, making

English

a compulsory

subject

in schools across the globe has its merits.

Firstly

,

English

is widely recognized as the international

language

of

communication

, and having a good command of it can open up numerous opportunities for individuals in terms of

education

, employment, and travel.

For example

, many universities and companies require a certain level of

English

proficiency for admission or employment, which can only be achieved through proper

education

.

Secondly

, learning

English

can promote cultural exchange and understanding among people from different countries. By being able to communicate in a common

language

, individuals can share ideas, experiences, and perspectives, fostering a more tolerant and interconnected world.

On the other hand

, there are valid arguments against making

English

a mandatory

subject

for all school children. One major concern is the potential loss of cultural identity and linguistic diversity. Imposing a foreign

language

on students may lead to the neglect or even extinction of their native languages, which are an essential part of their cultural heritage.

Moreover

, not all countries have the resources and infrastructure to provide high-quality

English

education

, which may result in a subpar learning experience for students.

This

could lead to frustration and a lack of motivation, ultimately doing more harm than good. In my opinion,

while

the benefits of learning

English

cannot be denied, making it a compulsory

subject

for all

schoolchildrenchildren

Correct your spelling

schoolchildren children

might not be the best

approach

.

Instead

, governments should invest in improving the quality of

English

education

and provide students with the option to learn the

language

if they wish to do so.

This

would allow for a more balanced

approach

that respects cultural diversity

while

still promoting global

communication

. In conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages to making

English

a mandatory

subject

for all

schoolchildrenchildren

Correct your spelling

schoolchildren children

around the world.

While

it can undoubtedly enhance international

communication

and open up opportunities, it may

also

lead to the loss of cultural identity and linguistic diversity. A more balanced

approach

that respects individual choice and cultural heritage should be considered.