Some people say that in all levels of education from primary to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree?

There is a common thinking that the

time

allocation to develop practical skills is not sufficient,

whereas

a major portion of

time

is spent on learning

facts

.

Further

,

this

is a general practice though out the education system from the primary to territory level.

This

essay agrees with

this

opinion. Because in every curricular the theoretical part is more than the practical sessions.

Also

, the

time

requirement to deliver

facts

to students is high. The syllabus at every stage of education focuses more on understanding theory. The practical

application

comes next.

Therefore

, always the passing

knowledge

has a wider scope. As an example, in financial accounting more

time

is spent on learning Accounting Standards, and practical

application

is done by checking their

application

to different scenarios.

This

is one reason to have a separate requirement to have industrial training before to practice as Chartered Accountant. The learning duration is high because it takes more

time

to learn new things.

Hence

, teachers need to work more

time

in sharing

knowledge

. Because the student needs to be clear with

facts

else the practical

application

would go for a six.

Further

, during the practice period

also

students require to have a comprehensive set of study materials to refer to.

In other words

, theory is the foundation for a student to have the right set of information and

knowledge

. In conclusion, the education systems allocate more

time

to learning

facts

because the subject curriculums are designed in

such

a way.

Further

,

knowledge

delivery needs more

time

for teachers as it is the core of learning.