Some people think the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles in order to solve environment problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Environmental issues are escalating at an alarming rate ,especially pollution; some groups of people opine to solve

this

problem by increasing the

fuel

pricing for four-wheelers.

Although

this

method would be proven effective, there are other alternatives that can be considered.

To begin

, an increment in the cost of

fuel

can help to reduce atmospheric problems because it would become difficult for folks to spare money for

fuel

from their earnings. Most of the people who belong to lower to middle-class families would be unable to fill up their vehicle's tank to commute,

hence

reductions in the number of automobiles could be seen on the road.

Therefore

, it would be a significant step by the state towards improving the environment.

On the contrary

, some other measures are recommended to enhance environmental conditions. First and foremost is to impose a tax on automobiles to make them expensive as

this

could lead to less congestion. The predominant reason behind air contamination is carbon dioxide which eventually gets lower with no more unnecessary buying of cars. In Japan, tax imposition is extremely high on new buyers of cars and buses,

thus

Japan is a pollution-free country.

In addition

, the introduction of electric vehicles can not only improve the air quality but

also

there would be less consumption of fossil

fuel

. Consuming petrol and diesel enormously makes the resources less available for the next generation,

whereas

vehicles running on electricity help to control excessive consumption and contamination. In conclusion, the method of increasing

fuel

rate is not the mere way to save the environment, a few other measures including a tax on vehicles and the introduction of eco-friendly cars can be meant to cut down excessive contaminants in the air.