Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Every

city

is distinct, with a certain vibe,

structures

Fix the agreement mistake

structure

show examples

, or surroundings. Some claim that aesthetic factors should be taken into account when building a

city

,

while

others stick to the thought that practicality ought to be the primary goal. From my perspective, I lean toward the latter idea as

cities

’ full gamut of functionality would be a more economical choice for several reasons discussed below.

To begin

with, some dwellers suppose that metropolises should be constructed with gorgeous designs as those can enhance

cities

' economy. The reason for

this

is that tourism can be boosted since plenty of excursionists would be attracted by magnificent architecture.

For instance

,Dubai is one of the most attractive

cities

for travellers

due to

its skyscrapers,

thus

, the

city

earns a lot of money.

However

, annual maintenance requires the

cities

to invest a large amount of money in

those

Correct determiner usage

apply

show examples

appealing designs,

such

as repetitive painting or redrawing.

Besides

, the opposing argument makes the case that expanding particular services is significantly more vital because it would enchant more tourists than alluring charms. As people tend to choose the destination that can respond to their needs

such

as hotels, hospitals or supermarkets, a

city

with

Change preposition

apply

show examples

full of functionality would be their

prioritizing

Replace the word

prioritised

show examples

choice.

In addition

, providing facilities is more cost-effective than designing as it does not require periodic maintenance costs. In conclusion,

while

some believe that

cities

should be made to look attractive, others believe that their practicality should take precedence. I suppose metropolises should focus on offering adequate functioning because it can both increase tourism and be more affordable.