Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Issues related to the building construction budget and maintenance costs are frequently discussed these days. It is argued that in terms of a financial topic, we should knock down old buildings and build new ones
instead
of renovating them. I completely disagree with
this
assertion and think that the construction payment for reconstruction is not much lower than renovation. The principal reason to consider is that setting up a new building or house can lead to the following costs demolishing, piling, beam and column structuring. These mentioned elements are the primary fees for any real estate project.
For instance
, many cafés, bars, and restaurants in Thailand avoid creating new stores
instead
of designing them from the existing conditions. Not only to decrease the price but
also
to save time from many processes namely, bidding tasks, and building permission. An additional point is that knocking down all of the forming can result in to loss of the attraction sense of place. In beauty terms, many ancient frameworks have their own aesthetic feeling. We can use these aged parts to create unique concepts or designs that can differentiate our scheme from the others. To exemplify, We can create the juxtaposition of interior or architecture by combining brand-new items with classic features. All things considered, I am of the opinion that it is reasonable to renovate the building and mix it with new ideas that can preserve the sense of location and decrease resource consumption.
Therefore
, we have to look at the feasibility first to find a worthwhile way before establishing the project.
Submitted by nine318 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Preservation
  • Restoration
  • Demolition
  • Architectural heritage
  • Cultural significance
  • Tourist attraction
  • Urban landscape
  • Sustainability
  • Conservation
  • Economic benefits
  • Historical landmarks
  • Urban renewal
  • Infrastructure
  • Maintenance costs
  • Modern amenities
  • Building regulations
  • Community identity
  • Heritage conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: