Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The endless conflicts that soar across the globe are inextricably linked to the rising demand for refuge for those affected. In an ideal world, nations with more fiscal power should provide more help in retaining the well-being of humanity.

However

Linking Words

, data shows that

this

Linking Words

is not the case and I firmly agree that they should assist a higher number of refugees. To commence with the notion, wealthier countries hold greater capabilities in providing decent basic needs

such

Linking Words

as food and accommodation. As for now, lower-income states disproportionally host more asylum seekers, exceeding their economic ability.

Consequently

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

leads to new problems

such

Linking Words

as slums and scarcity of resources.

This

Linking Words

matter can be tackled if the hosting is done evenly parallel to each area’s economic condition.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, accepting new society members can be beneficial for the bearer.

For instance

Linking Words

, they enrich the local community by bringing diversity into the place. Not only that, the productivity level can be expected to improve with these new individuals who carry knowledge and skills. Simultaneously, the economy of that very nation

also

Linking Words

will be enhanced. In the end,

this

Linking Words

assimilation result is what creates a resourceful territory.

To conclude

Linking Words

, serving a sanctuary for those who, through no fault of their own, need it should be valued by every country especially the richer ones that can supply better facilities.

Therefore

Linking Words

, the collective will of a state and its political agreement is essential in making

this

Linking Words

possible. After all, the act of sharing responsibilities is what makes the world a better place.