Most agree that we should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth’s natural resources. However, some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feels schools are more responsible. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Teaching children the necessity of recycling waste in order to conserve natural resources is a widespread belief.
However
, many advocate that it is the responsibility of
parents
to teach their offspring about it, meanwhile, others argue that teachers should tackle
this
task.
While
parents
can encourage their
kids
to become environmental advocates, I would argue that schools hold the crucial obligation of educating pupils about the importance of recycling waste. Many outline that
parents
should be the ones who train their offspring about important tasks everyone ought to know in order to help lower pollution, namely how to recycle litter. The reason for
this
is that
kids
spend the most time with their
parents
and mostly consider them as role models.
As a consequence
, Their advice would be more acceptable and would shape their personality to turn into a natural advocate individual.
For example
, Gretta Tumberg, who is a Swedish environmental philanthropist, has been a global player from the age of 12 requesting unity around the world and inciting demonstrations to gain support for combating climate change. She is indeed a clear example of the parental effect on offspring regarding the issue of climate change.
Hence
,
parents
are capable of having a significant impact on their children regarding a variety of issues including environmental protection. On the flip side, I would argue that the crux of the matter should be handled by teachers in schools. Generally,
parents
do not have the required data to persuade their
kids
about important issues, and
therefore
, teachers whose jobs force them to acquire knowledge on a regular basis so that they can answer any upcoming question from their students, are more eligible to handle the task of training
kids
about vital matters.
As a result
, students would have a better understanding of the facts and can
also
gain passion for the subject. Many developed countries,
for instance
, have been drafting their curriculums so that they could cover crucial subjects
such
as environmental hazards at school as a means of upbringing pupils with the motivation and essential knowledge for urgent matters.
By contrast
, developing countries have been neglecting
this
for decades and now the majority of graduates do not have sufficient information about natural preservation. In conclusion, I would argue that schools are the most effective way of informing children about nature and the way to protect it
whereas
many believe that
parents
can play the most significant role.
Submitted by sajadtorab on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: