Most agree that we should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth’s natural resources. However, some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feels schools are more responsible. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Teaching children the necessity of recycling waste in order to conserve natural resources is a widespread belief.

However

Linking Words

, many advocate that it is the responsibility of

parents

Use synonyms

to teach their offspring about it, meanwhile, others argue that teachers should tackle

this

Linking Words

task.

While

Linking Words

parents

Use synonyms

can encourage their

kids

Use synonyms

to become environmental advocates, I would argue that schools hold the crucial obligation of educating pupils about the importance of recycling waste. Many outline that

parents

Use synonyms

should be the ones who train their offspring about important tasks everyone ought to know in order to help lower pollution, namely how to recycle litter. The reason for

this

Linking Words

is that

kids

Use synonyms

spend the most time with their

parents

Use synonyms

and mostly consider them as role models.

As a consequence

Linking Words

, Their advice would be more acceptable and would shape their personality to turn into a natural advocate individual.

For example

Linking Words

, Gretta Tumberg, who is a Swedish environmental philanthropist, has been a global player from the age of 12 requesting unity around the world and inciting demonstrations to gain support for combating climate change. She is indeed a clear example of the parental effect on offspring regarding the issue of climate change.

Hence

Linking Words

,

parents

Use synonyms

are capable of having a significant impact on their children regarding a variety of issues including environmental protection. On the flip side, I would argue that the crux of the matter should be handled by teachers in schools. Generally,

parents

Use synonyms

do not have the required data to persuade their

kids

Use synonyms

about important issues, and

therefore

Linking Words

, teachers whose jobs force them to acquire knowledge on a regular basis so that they can answer any upcoming question from their students, are more eligible to handle the task of training

kids

Use synonyms

about vital matters.

As a result

Linking Words

, students would have a better understanding of the facts and can

also

Linking Words

gain passion for the subject. Many developed countries,

for instance

Linking Words

, have been drafting their curriculums so that they could cover crucial subjects

such

Linking Words

as environmental hazards at school as a means of upbringing pupils with the motivation and essential knowledge for urgent matters.

By contrast

Linking Words

, developing countries have been neglecting

this

Linking Words

for decades and now the majority of graduates do not have sufficient information about natural preservation. In conclusion, I would argue that schools are the most effective way of informing children about nature and the way to protect it

whereas

Linking Words

many believe that

parents

Use synonyms

can play the most significant role.