Nowadays the great majority of people tend to live without children at a young age, though it may lead our society to bad consequences.
Although
the Linking Words
last
opinion can be right in some cases, I would say that the decision to have kids later is better.
Let us start by looking at the advantages of that trend. In many countries, especially in Europe, adults choose to improve their life conditions Linking Words
instead
of making a family. Linking Words
As a result
, by their thirties, they Linking Words
have
stable salaries, houses, cars, and other precious things. Wrong verb form
had
According to
statistics, kids in Linking Words
such
families are wealthier, they live with a sureness about the next day and as a rule have Linking Words
good
education. If we look at the situation in poor countries, where parents do not care about the young generation's future, we will see that teenagers have no education, no money and sometimes, no food.
Turning to the other side of the argument, it is obvious that children scarcity may affect Add an article
a good
the
society in a bad way. Correct article usage
apply
For example
, In Japan Linking Words
due to
the focus on careers, people choose to work hard rather than pay attention to relationships. Unless we do not take action urgently, Japan will face the greatest problems, Linking Words
such
as a lack of population Linking Words
as well as
national traditions disappearance.
Taking everything into consideration, I believe that the decision not to have children as fast as we can is not so detrimental to the world. It is better to provide everything for future generations in the consciousness age so that to improve our future as well.Linking Words
aida.ai2000