Universities should allocate the same amount of money to sports activities as they do allocate to the libraries To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary era,

sports

are an essential part of any individual's life period. Some people argue that universities should be more focused on education and spend minimal on sport activities,

whereas

others believe that

sports

are a part of the student's

overall

development and should given the same priority as other study courses. Personally, I believe that an equal amount of revenue should be given to

sports

activities and libraries.

To begin

with,

as a result

of more money allocation,a student can avail better quality resources and

also

extracurricular team can cover more range of

games

.

For instance

, universities that have less budget for

sports

, only have resources or trainers for popular

games

like cricket,

however

Add a comma

,however

show examples

no attention is given to unpopular

games

like a pool table.

Secondly

, with better training and good types of equipment, students can bring revenue to the organization by participating in and conquering different competitions.

Apart from

this

, Many people make successful careers out of sport which will escalate the reputation of the university.

For example

, there is one cricket player playing for India named Harmandeep Singh who studied at Guru Nayak University.

This

university always shows the story of Harmandeep

while

advertising.

In addition

to that,

this

can

also

be beneficial to democracy as students find interest in their

games

at an early age which may bring Olympic medals to the nation later. To illustrate

this

, Viswanathan Anand started playing chess at the age of 7 and now he bought many medals for society.

To conclude

, Not only education but

sports

also

have created lots of starts which provided many benefits to the universities or the country, so

sports

activities should be treated the same as educational courses.