some people think that more money should be spend on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money. and provide your own opinion.

There is a debate among

people

regarding funding endangered animals . Some

people

believe that there should be a grant for protection,

whereas

others consider

this

as a waste of financial resources. I personally agree with the investment and in the following, I will delineate my view.

To begin

, it is crucial to invest in securing animals that are endangered of extinction since

this

phenomenon has detrimental effects on biodiversity and the planet. When a rare animal disappears, its predators and its prey are influenced at first as the food for its predators becomes rare,

while

its prey becomes widespread in the habitat.

For example

, you can only see a Persian lion in the zoo as its wild one does not live in the Iranian jungle anymore.

As a result

, the number of foxes, which are its main food, has increased

therefore

these foxes are hunting too many farming animals.

On the contrary

,

people

think that there are other serious issues, for investment.

For instance

, the rate of hunger is growing swiftly and there is a need for an immediate response.

Although

the number of hungry

people

has jumped for the past decade, these rare species can accelerate

this

rate too. I mean that some of these living creatures can be used as a source of nutrients for humans or they can protect farming from natural damages like insects.

For example

, some birds like bats eat insects.

Consequently

, if bats disappear, there would be a huge number of insects around the world as they may destroy agriculture or spread perilous diseases like Malaria. In conclusion, I believe that an investment in

this

field secures the future of the planet and mankind as the environment would not go under destructive changes.