Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?

Public finance expenditures are cared about by almost all

people

, so how to allocate the national budget into any sector catches plenty of attention of citizens and financial assistance for art is a vexing conundrum in any country. Some

people

refer to the benefit of

this

as the preservation of culture and customs,

while

others consider it a waste of resources. I am convinced by the justifiable reason for conservation cultural meaning, so I firmly agree with the former opinion.

To begin

with, there seems a general consensus among both opinion groups is if artists were sponsored by the government budget, it would have avoided the disappearance of some kind of artwork, which are foundation value of their national population. In

further

explanation, recognising the implicit meaning of some distinctive customs helps youngsters proud of their ancestors and the purposes of these festivals for human living, which their previous

people

wanted to prompt. New Year's Eye with plenty of traditional activities,

such

as singing some old-meaning songs,

according to

the lunar calendar in Asia with agricultural culture is an example, and the meaningful worthy of

this

is announcing preparation times for the new food crop in farmland

that is

ready. So, in order to protect these valuables, which require the government must give financial support to creative musicians, whose national songs need to be refreshed with the same content to catch up with the changes of the technology era.

Nevertheless

, perhaps the major factor for opposing

this

is art does not play a vital role in society, and

this

investment is a waste of resources.

In contrast

, funding could be better granted to more pressing social issues in order to improve population living expectancy and standards.

In particular

, more

people

are living under the poverty line and usually suffer starvation in daily life,

while

the majority of the population is working in hazardous conditions with low wages compared to the potential risks of their jobs. So, education is the most important sector that needs to be invested in just to improve material living quality.

Besides

, sponsoring medical research by public ministry is

also

necessary to improve average living expectancy.

To conclude

, despite some crucial sectors that need to be funded by the national budget, from my perspective, the demantory role of creative activities in the foundation of humans is more important and

this

invisible value is necessary for allocating a suitable percentage of expenditure.