IELTS Writing Samples by topic

Get a band score and detailed report instantly. Check your IELTS essays right now!
Art is the most wonderful thing in our life. In some countries, artworks have an important role and are supported by the government every year. However, some people comment that the government endowment should be used for developing cultural activities instead of displaying crafts to promote the country’s background. In my opinion, using artworks to represent the culture is one of the creative ways should be encouraged in the future. Sometimes, words are not as powerful as artistry.
Culture is the only thing that humans could not create. In some countries, artworks have an important role and are supported by the government every year. However, some people comment that the government endowment should be used for developing cultural activities instead of displaying crafts to promote the country’s background. In my opinion, using artworks to represent the culture is one of the creative ways should be encouraged. Sometimes, words are not as powerful as artistry.
Government should spent its money effectively for the welfare of the people. Some people believe that it is necessary to support art and culture through government funding. So that it will be helpfull for people and culture. while some people thinks that it is unnecessary.
Despite the fact that the matter of art and culture has not caught the attention, it does not mean it is less vital. One can subscribe to a notion that government funding should not be used for art and culture, the paradox is there will be many benefits for the population and culture when supporting the cultural activities. It is justified that the authorities should pay for these activities. In this essay, we will analyze both of the views.
Art in many times and by many ways can represent the cutlture of countries. Governement must support Art. Though, some people think it is a waste of time and resources.
In this technological era, the use of smartphones is vital to concrete tasks such as making phone calls, sending and receiving emails an so on. As it seems to occupy an essential place in people's life, I agree with the idea that there are more benefits than drawbacks.
People are divided on the opinion of the government spendings on art and culture. It is often thought by some that the authorities ought to be focus on promoting the arts; however, in my opinion i agree with the view that other issues like health and education require more attention and i agree.
It has been argued by many that the government should not fund art as it is a sheer waste of resources as the money can be spent on the uplift of basic necessities of life, whereas others believe that spending on such activities is necessary to keep the values of a nation alive. In my opinion, I fully agree with the former belief that the humanity takes priority and the state should stop supporting fields like culture.
Majority of people believe art and culture are for the governement funding , while others think the opposite they believe there is something beneficial for the dwellers and the culture regarding to cultural activities which people benefit from .
Many people strongly believe that it is not necessary to use the public money for art and culture ,while some people argue that the government ought to invest money in cultural activities because of their merits for human life and the culture. In this essay, I will discuss two views and give my opinion.
For those who are interested it is possible to surf the Internet or read articles discussing art and culture. There are several points of view on this matter. The first claim government must not use charity for art and culture. An alternative belief regards that this is harmful and considers culture have a plethora of advantages for citizens as the most important in that case essay both points of view are going to be examined and a particular opinion will be provided.
In modern society, there is a heated debate about whether governments should subsidize artistic and cultural activities. While the notion of public funding for the arts and culture is opposed by a few, I am firmly convinced that government expenditure should be spent on these sectors for some reasons.
It is an irrefutable fact that art portrays the history of a nation beautifully. Many countries spend a considerable amount of funds on supporting the arts and culture. Although, a segment of society is convinced that taxpayers money should be spent on more pressing issues such as education and medical care. However, both points of view need to be addressed before formulating an opinion.
There is an argument about helping the state to preserve cultural values and art by donating its facilities. while knowing the government could invest in some more critical topics such as environmental problems or educational matters, I believe that local cultures of every country are part of this heritage and at the same time art portrays the history of a nation beautifully. So both the governing and private companies have the responsibility to conserve it as they can many benefits for people and history.
Some societies think that government grants must not be used for encouraging art and culture, whilst other people feel more emphasis on cultural exercise are advantageous for the country's people as well as culture, too. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and give examples. Firstly, I will explore the government funding for art and culture and secondly I will discuss the other view that how cultural activities may be beneficial.
In this contemporary world, some individuals believe that authorities should support financially their country's culture and artwork while others think the fund should be spent on matters that benefit their community. Both arguments will be discussed in this essay.
Honestly, culture is one of the main factors of a nation and it should be conserved forever. While some people argue that it should not be supported by government funding, I am of the opinion that supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the
It is argued by some that there is no need to support art and culture through government funding while others assert that supporting cultural activities through the government it will be beneficial for both population and culture. This essay will discuss
Many people are convinced that government financial resources shouldn’t be used for art and cultural programmes; however, others advocate that spending in favor of art and culture could be vital for society. Although I believe in the second view, I would
It has been argued that few people think the government should not fund for arts as it is a sheer waste of money and many think in contrast. My opinion , I fully agree with the former belief as humanity takes precedence in priority. Arguments for the agre
Become Premium
  • Check as many essays as you want
  • Analyze highlighted mistakes
  • Use the built-in grammar checker
  • Discover your weaknesses
  • Get suggestions to get a higher score
  • Browse the history of checked essays
  • 14-day money back guarantee