Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves. Some people think that this is a good thing, while others think that it has disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

While

some socialists argue that

sports

sponsorship by companies is a

favorable

Change the spelling

favourable

show examples

trend, others think it is a disadvantageous way of propaganda. I am a staunch believer that it is beneficial because it puts physical activity practices in the spotlight. Both perspectives,

along with

my opinion, will be

further

explained. On the one hand, some sponsors market their harmful

products

through

sports

commercials regardless of their impact on individuals.

In other words

, when the public

watch

Correct subject-verb agreement

watches

show examples

their beloved athletes advertised for damaging

products

, they will be connected to

this

product regardless of its danger. An eminent example is the American Football Team, which is sponsored by a beer-producing company that uses the players in beer consumption-encouraging propaganda.

Therefore

, some companies exploit

sports

to encourage people to consume their harmful

products

.

On the other hand

, injecting companies' investments in

sports

through sponsorship and advertising increases

sports

' significance among people. To illustrate, if publicity campaigns focus on sporting events and games, it will attract youths to

sports

rather than drug abuse or smoking.

This

can be witnessed in Egypt, where PEPSI invests in a volleyball league, followed by most Egyptian teenagers who dream about fame and success.

Thus

, the more investments

sports

receive, the brighter and more attractive they become and the more influential in society they will be. In conclusion, despite some commercials encouraging individuals to consume detrimental

products

, they attract youths to lead productive lives like their role model players. I deem

this

trend to be beneficial to

sports

and communities