Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is no denying the fact that giving poorer

people

money

to rich

countries

did not solve any financial issues.

While

it is a commonly held belief that they ought to give them another type of help to help them, there is

also

an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that we should look for another way to help these

countries

.

To begin

with, when we give them

money

there are

people

in these poorer communities who take

this

fund and do not arrive at the

people

that they need.

In other words

, big companies sometimes do not give the

money

to them and take it for them.

In addition

, we could say that poverty

people

do not have the knowledge of how to deal with

this

money

.

For example

, the United States when they lent

money

to Egypt, spent on things that did not help them at all. another point to consider, developed

countries

should invest in things that can benefit the community in the future. It is

also

possible to say that, investing in shops or making jobs for these

countries

can help the

people

to find jobs and get a salary to help their families.

Moreover

, build roads, buildings and other things so

people

can use them.

For instance

, we can build houses for these big families, we can build supermarkets to create more jobs offer. In conclusion, despite

people

having different views, I believe that investing in shops and local companies can cause a decrease in poverty and solve

this

significant problem.