Some people think that governments should spend money for faster public transportation, others think that there are other important priorities (e.g. cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some individuals argue that authorities ought to spend money on faster public transportation,
while
others believe that there are other crucial precedences,
such
as cost and environment. I believe we should spend money on transportation but
also
spend payment on other things, I will elaborate on it in
this
essay. On the one hand, our society has developed,
thus
many people move to big cities.
As a result
, big city house costs and customer costs are rising, so some nations have to move to the suburbs, and they need fast public transit.
For example
, In South Korea, numerous folks live in Seoul because there are a lot of companies in that city, and most nations work there.
However
, Seoul's living
cost
Fix the agreement mistake
costs
show examples
is
Correct subject-verb agreement
are
show examples
very expensive.
Consequently
, around 60 per cent of communities move to the suburbs, but those cities do have not fast transportation so they suffer.
Therefore
, the government should spend pay on them so they will live better.
On the other hand
, today, many factories are built, and they release a lot of emits into the sky, so our habitat is polluted because of that.
For instance
, In South Korea, in the 1960s, the state wanted to their industries be developed so they permitted numerous companies so they could advance their companies. But, at that time, they did not care about our climate, so they polluted the air and water, and it affected the present situation.
For
this
reason, we should spend funds on nature if we do not, our environment will be destroyed. In conclusion, I think the government should spend bills balance because our societies are growing
as well as
the population. If the government spend funds on fast shipment, many people use public vehicles
instead
of their cars which can reduce emits.
In addition
, politics ought to spend cash on the environment, which will be good not only for us but
also
for our planet.
Submitted by livewire53 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Introduction
Ensure that your introduction clearly presents the topic and your stance on it. Offering a brief outline of the points you will discuss can make your argument more digestible.
Balance
Try to explore both sides of the argument evenly before stating your opinion. This will make your response more balanced and comprehensive.
Paragraphing
Use paragraphing to separate ideas and enhance readability. A new paragraph for each main idea helps in organizing your essay and making it more coherent.
Vocabulary
Be mindful of repetitive phrases and try to use synonyms to avoid redundancy. For instance, instead of repeating 'spend money/pay/funds' consider using 'allocate resources,' 'invest in,' or 'fund'.
Grammar
Pay attention to grammar and punctuation. Proper use of commas, periods, and sentence structures enhances clarity and professionalism in your writing.
Transitions
Incorporate transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs to connect ideas smoothly. Words like 'however,' 'consequently,' 'for instance,' provide a logical flow to your argument.
Content
Effort in exploring both views of the argument.
Examples
Attempt to provide examples to support your points, which helps in illustrating your point of view.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • government expenditure
  • public transportation infrastructure
  • congestion
  • productivity
  • environmental sustainability
  • allocate funds
  • cost-effective
  • balancing priorities
  • reduce carbon emissions
  • urban planning
What to do next:
Look at other essays: