10.It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than the world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that it is crucial for young kids to know about local happenings,

while

others give importance to global

history

as it is considered more useful. Each place has its unique

history

. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that local

history

should be taught to school

children

. I will propose a possible illustration for the same.

To begin

with, every place has a unique set of

events

that are worth preserving.

Therefore

, it is important for

children

to learn about the

history

of their surroundings.

History

can be altered and lost over time. To prevent

such

occurrences, it is necessary to encourage

children

to seek knowledge about their surroundings.

For example

, some of the tribes lost their

history

and origin, and now they don't have a promising tale to tell. In all,

history

preserves the authenticity of a location.

Secondly

, it requires an emotional attachment to the land, which often helps

children

grow stronger.

In other words

, it entails a sense of patriotism for the place and binds the soul with the soil.

For instance

, people tend to die to protect their unique culture and heritage. They take pride in their

history

and want to pass these values on to their

children

.

To conclude

,

history

is not just a factual representation of the occurrence of

events

; it is

also

emotionally connected to people's lives.

Therefore

, it is essential for

children

to learn about the

events

that shaped their ancestors' lives. It is the responsibility of parents and the government to ensure that positive

events

are recorded in

children

's schoolbooks.