Nowadays, tourists and scientists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answers and include example from your own experience?

Presently, Trippers and researchers are travelling to remote natural habitats. Governments are allowing them to explore remote

areas

which are famous for flora and fauna. , it has its own advantages like exploring new discoveries

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and unearthing new natural secrets.

Whereas

its disadvantage is that it is too perilous to take

such

kind of steps. , it can be too hazardous to research and explore uncharted territories. First and foremost, discoveries and inventions are necessary to elevate human civilisation. The government must support exploring remote

areas

.

Moreover

,Holidaymakers are always searching for new experiences so

this

will promote tourism too.

For example

. Amazon forests are discovered by humans only.

As a result

,if exploring was not allowed

then

we would not be able to know the importance of

such

discoveries.

However

, EXPLoring remote or uncharted territories is always perilous and researchers and visitors should always exercise care and precaution

while

taking

such

trips.

Furthermore

,Life in these

areas

is always risky . Professionals and sightseers should not be allowed to explore remote

areas

.

For example

, in ,India one of the islands Andaman and Nicobar Islands is famous for its volcanoes. Indian authorities have forbidden visits to that island. In conclusion,

Although

visits to new remote

areas

bring much scientific discovery and revenue by tourism.

such

risk should not be encouraged by the administration as its disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Exploring

such

areas

carries a high risk and can prove detrimental to human life.In my ,opinion the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of exploring new

areas

for scientists and visitors.