Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

To some, experimentation on animals is inhuman and unethical since they can be harmed,

while

Linking Words

others believe that it is a mainly positive concept, helping humanity by developing medicine. I believe that experimentation on beasts is very useful and should be allowed. In the case of the preservation of animals, first of all, the species used are human beings. They not only have their own intelligence but

also

Linking Words

a way of communicating properly and expressing their feelings, confirming that laboratory beasts are equally able to enjoy the beauty of life as humans do. Many mammals on which we experiment tend to feel stressed or menaced by experimentation.

For instance

Linking Words

, guinea pigs often take their own lives under stress, by choosing to stop eating. As for the support of the tests, many ideas are relevant.

To begin

Linking Words

with, the safeguard of billions of people can be insured by only thousands of small creatures. In the case of COVID-19 ,

for example

Linking Words

, in the development of the vaccines, many tests were conducted on mammals before being tried on the population, helping to ensure that a medication that protected millions was harmless.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, the tests are not meant to harm, but to observe, signifying

consequently

Linking Words

that not all animals suffer from it.

To conclude

Linking Words

, even if the experiments bring a lot to the advances in medicine, I believe that a compromise should be reached, ensuring the well-being and the protection of these creatures , but allowing experimentations and observations that could lead to the safety of many humans and other species.