Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing

traffic

and pollution problems. In

this

essay, I will explain the reasons why I firmly disagree with

this

remedy, as there are superior alternative solutions: congestion pricing and car-sharing and carpooling programs.

To begin

, increasing petrol

prices

can lead to a reduction in

traffic

volume to some extent.

In other words

,

this

creates adequate pressure on money-conscious individuals and has a serious impact on the daily earnings of low-income individuals.

Hence

,

this

partially contributes to reducing congestion during rush hours because citizens swiftly switch from motorbikes to public transport to deal with the exorbitant gasoline

prices

.

Although

this

solution has limited the number of daily commuters, it does not proportionately reduce the

carbon

footprint, as motorbikes are only responsible for a small proportion of emissions. The amount of

carbon

dioxide released by the wealthy, who commute by private car and aeroplane, is larger than that emitted by the poor's motorbikes.

For example

, a large quantity of

carbon

dioxide is released from aeroplanes in the lucrative aviation market, space exploration projects, and military vehicles.

Therefore

, raising gasoline

prices

is not the best solution for

this

issue and cannot lead to significant changes without complementary measures. These conundrums require a comprehensive approach.

Nevertheless

, a more effective measure is the commitment of the government to achieve neutral

carbon

emissions by 2050, as stated in an international summit on climate change.

This

commitment promotes government policies to enforce stricter solutions,

such

as financial charges for gasoline cars during peak hours, and executing car-sharing and carpooling programs.

Additionally

, there should be a standardized effort in manufacturing affordable electric cars.

For instance

, Hanoi, which applied congestion pricing, has improved its atmospheric standards in the inner city by encouraging more people to use buses. By improving the quality of public transportation services, including better quality, coverage on convenient routes, and increased frequency, citizens switch to zero-emission public transport.

To conclude

,

while

the notion of increasing petrol

prices

offers a potential remedy for burgeoning

traffic

and pollution issues, I think

this

is not the best solution for

this

problem.

Instead

, governments should focus on wider-reaching policies, including the promotion of electric vehicles and the implementation of car-sharing initiatives. In adopting these comprehensive measures, we can genuinely address the challenges posed by

traffic

and pollution in an effective and equitable manner.