It is sometimes argued that rising the cost of fossil fuel is the most effective solution for environmental and problems on the roads these days. While I agree that this method is extremely successful in decreasing the amount of exhaust fumes that were emitted and the number of traffic congestion, I believe that there are other possible measures that have similar result.
It's argued that increasing the price of petrol is the most reasonable way to approach the ongoing traffic and pollution problem. However, I disagree with that statement. And in this essay I will state my reasoning for that while suggesting two solutions
The traffic congestion and pollution problems cannot be resolved by raising the price of fuel. I completely disagree with the statement, because these kinds of initiatives only put a burden on people. We should and persuade them to shift on the other resources of energy as well as to travel by public transportation.
Nowadays, one of the government's solutions to reduce traffic and pollution is increasing the petrol price. while there are some advantages of this trend, I firmly believe that the disadvantages are far more.
Industrialisation and increase in the working population has caused an overuse of motor vehicles in todays day and age. The implementation of higher prices of petrol has been suggested as one way of fixing the dialemma of growing traffic and pollution. In
Environment pollution has been affecting our planet in the recent decade. Many governments have recently decided to increase the cost of fuel in order to resolve this issue. I strongly feel that this decision is not the only solution to the problem and we will need to approach in differnt light.
Some individuals argue that the heightened price of petrol is the most effective method of tackling the problems pertaining to increasing traffic and environmental contamination. While I accept that this measure is good in some ways, I believe that there are better measures for this problem.
Some individuals argue that the heightened price of petrol is the most effective method of tackling to growing traffic and environmental pollution. While I accept that this method is good in some ways, I believe that there are better measures for this problem.
Now-a-days, pollution is the major part in our day to day life. The sources are many like combustion of oils extracted from fossils namely petrol, diesel. In Developing countries, there is a huge requirement for vehicles for commuting which in turn leads to pollution and traffic.
I agree, with the statement, to increase the price of the fuel, will impact vehicle conjuction and reduce the environment hazards. Apart from the mentioned, there are few more precautions need to be taken, which we will discuss in the latter part.
The most effective means of resolving the growing problem of traffic and pollution is by raising the cost of fossil fuel. I totally agree with this view because it will lead to a decrease in the number of automobile on the roads. Also, constructing more roads and bridges is another excellent means to curb this menace.
The best approach in resolving the increasing problem of gridlock and pollution is by raising the cost of fossil fuel. I totally agree with this view because the increase would decrease the number of automobiles on the roads. Nevertheless, constructing more roads is another excellent means to curb this menace.
The best solution suggested to eradicate traffic and pollution is to increase the cost of petrol. Although, an increase in the price of petrol does not promise a decrease in traffic or pollution created by vehicles.
Rapid urbanization and deforestation have led to rise in number of vehicles in cities and have also caused alarming levels of environmental pollution. Some people think that making petrol costlier is the best way to resolve both these issues, however, I do not agree with this and in my opinion several other measures need to be implemented to reduce traffic and pollution.
Some people believe that the best way to reduce traffic and pollution from transportation is rising the cost of fuel. This essay disagrees with this solution, a better way is changing personal behaviour, and improve the public transport together.
Increase in automobiles leads to environmental and traffic problems. The rise in petrol price is the best way to solve all the problems. I completely disagree with this statement However, this essay will discuss about the other factors that might be effective.
It is often believed that soaring prices of petrol are the most feasible solution for dealing with problems such as rise in traffic congestion on roads and pollution. This essay does not agree with the given statement, and discusses the reasons for disagreement, followed by providing the viable solutions to solve these issues.
Many people believe that increasing the gasoline rates would be the best possible mean to reduce the traffic issues and growing pollution. Although a rise in petroleum cost may have some impact on traffic and pollution problems, it is definitely not the best option because it would result in inflation in the country. So I have to completely disagree with this. The better way to solve these problems would be to improve public transport and increase taxation on private cars.
Owing to the problems of high level of traffic and the increase of pollution, it is considered that increase in the price of petrol is the most effective way in solving these problems. I agree that increase in petrol price will help in fighting these problems. However there are other policies that can be implemented.
Owing to the problem anincrease in traffic and pollution. It is considered the price of petrol is the best way to solve these problems. I agree with this view, because increasing price of petrol will help in fighting these problems