Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed contries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a general consensus that financial aid cannot solve some chronic vexing
issues
in undeveloped nations
, so providing methods and knowledge for poverty nations
is a remaining potential solution for this
conundrum. I firmly agree with this
statement.
To begin
with, there are many benefits from monetary assistance. In particular
, the major beneficial return of this
is these poor nations
could have more time to temporarily solve their urgent issues
, such
as ensuring food availability in poor crop security or using this
money
to renovate infrastructure after a natural disaster. However
, this
cannot solve the implicit reasons behind these problems
because money
cannot improve the obsolete farming techniques and climate change, which menace the food security in this
nation. For example
, people need to advance construction methods to build river banks to stifle extreme natural calamities rather than money
to repair aftermaths, such
as river floods due to
sudden massive rainfall. Besides
, there are many problems
that cannot be solved by money
such
as corruption or political conflict.
Nevertheless
, It is advantageous to provide technology and education to poverty rather than money
. Firstly
, In some poor countries, conditions have created a humanitarian crisis, such
as poverty, famine or malnutrition. For instance
, Medical aid could be given in the form of teacher training and educational facilities rather than just financial aid because the development of hospitals and medical training, which is based on advanced technology from developed nations
, could ensure good health care. Secondly
, the authorities in developed nations
could suggest some judicial advice to help the undeveloped nation complete their legal system, particularly on tariffs, which could eradicate evading taxation issues
and regain more money
for urgent problems
. Lastly
, but more important than anything, supporting the economic growth of a poorer country can open up new markets for richer countries, so the capitalists from developed nations
could gain stable cash flow from their investment projects.
To conclude
, money
only solves some urgent issues
. I agree that technological support and judicial advice could address some chronic problems
in the third world.Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph is clearly linked to the previous one to maintain coherence and cohesion. Use transition words and phrases to guide the reader through your arguments.
task response
Provide a more nuanced discussion by considering potential counter-arguments and demonstrating a deeper understanding of the topic.