Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed contries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Financial aid cannot solve some chronic vexing issues in undeveloped nations, so providing methods and knowledge for poverty nations is a remaining potential solution for

this

conundrum. I firmly agree with

this

statement.

To begin

, there are many benefits from monetary assistance. Perhaps the major benefit is poor nations could have more time and temporarily solve their urgent issues,

such

as ensuring food availability in poor crop security or using

this

fund to renovate infrastructure after a natural disaster.

However

,

this

cannot solve the implicit reasons behind these problems,

due to

cash cannot improve the obsolete farming techniques and climate change that menace the food security in

this

nation.

For example

, people need to advance construction methods to build river banks to stifle extreme natural calamities rather than

money

to repair aftermaths,

such

as river floods owing to sudden massive rainfall.

Besides

, there are many challenges that cannot be solved by payment

such

as corruption or political conflict.

Nevertheless

, it is advantageous to provide technology and education to the poverty country rather than

money

.

Firstly

, in some poor countries, conditions have created a humanitarian crisis,

such

as poverty, famine or malnutrition.

For instance

, medical aid could be given in the form of teacher training and educational facilities rather than just financial aid. The development of hospitals and medical training based on advanced technology could enhance the quality of the healthcare system.

Secondly

, authorities in developed countries could suggest some judicial advice to help the undeveloped nation complete their legal system, particularly on tariffs.

Hence

, the poor country could eradicate evading taxation matters and regain more

money

for urgent problems.

Lastly

, supporting the economic growth of a poorer country can open up new markets for richer countries, so the capitalists could gain stable cash flow from their investment projects.

To conclude

,

money

only solves some urgent issues. I agree that technological support and judicial advice could address some chronic problems in the third world.